In Tameka's case, what defines Victoria's status regarding dependency?

In the context of dependency status for tax purposes, understanding the criteria for each classification is essential. A person qualifies as a dependent if they can be categorized as either a "Qualifying Child" or a "Qualifying Relative," both of which come with specific requirements.

To determine the status of a dependent, factors such as relationship, age, residence, financial support, and other conditions are considered. A "Qualifying Child" must typically be a child, stepchild, or eligible foster child of the taxpayer, among other criteria like age limits and living arrangements. On the other hand, a "Qualifying Relative" generally must not be the taxpayer’s child, must meet income tests, and must live with the taxpayer for more than half the year unless they are a parent.

When the answer indicates that Victoria's status is defined as "Neither," this implies that she does not meet the necessary conditions to be classified as either a "Qualifying Child" or a "Qualifying Relative." This could suggest that she does not possess the required familial relationship, income level, or residency status that would allow Tameka to claim her as a dependent. Therefore, the conclusion that Victoria's status is "Neither" aligns with a broader understanding of dependency rules